Last year «Russneft’» went to court with FNS on tax claims after 2003-2005 almost on 20 milliards of rub (without the account of cross-actions of nalogovikov). At first it lost and paid all debt, but then obtained in YOU a return 12,2 milliards of rub This sum could be approximately
on a 810 million rub anymore, if it were not for errors in decisions YOU. All wrong, even judges of the Higher arbitration court (YOU), a newspaper writes today "Lists".28 October, when a presidium listened YOU two from numerous businesses «Russnefti», on both were awarded judgement with arithmetic errors. In one — in behalf on nalogovikov
(just on an amount due «Russnefti»), a representative talks YOU Ann Kovaleva. In other — in a benefit «Russnefti» (on cross-action of FNS). These were simply misprints, which, apparently, appeared at preparation of projects of decisions, it explains. Offered to YOU parties
to specify tax obligations, but they preferred to wait till a specifying judicial certificate. And on May, 26 took away YOU new decisions — with corrections, Kovaleva adds (810 millions of rub go out, if to compare numbers from previous documents and new. — «Lists»). Similar
errors meet in practice YOU very rarely and always corrected, Kovaleva assures. Judges nobody to responsibility, certainly, does not attract, an asking about anonymity employee adds YOU: «All of us are people». But a mark is put and, if such errors will be much,
it tells on the career of judge, on his pay-envelope, he adds.On the whole on a country every tenth decision is exemplary — with the slips of the pen, blots and misprints, a partner is divided by supervisions «Nerr Shtifenkhofer Lutc» Ilya Rachkov, but of principle a bit: from data «Consultant
plus», only on 0,18% businesses then specifying decisions dart out.Judging on the archives of decisions, all courts mix up the numbers of businesses, dates of decisions, names of representatives of plaintiffs and defendants, roubles with dollars. Quite often the names of parties change due to a permanent printing-down.
Remembers crawfishes, that in one of processes of him yurfirmy bank «Trust», winning lawsuit to the borrower, in a court decision transformed in Al’fa-bank. «Daughter» « of Gazproma» — «Zarubezhneftegaz» — gosudar became
There were more odd cases: «to return» from a budget in place of «to exact»; «to abolish» in place of «to leave in force». For example, in the decision of the Federal arbitration court of the Moscow district (FRONT OF MO) from 2005 on business of VTB against LTD. «One zet»; mistake was corrected all through
nine days.The last misprint on the milliards of roubles in the Moscow region was on business of Mezhprombanka against the department of town-planning policy of Moscow. In 2004 FRONT of MO decreeed to exact from a bank 3,23 milliards of rub in place of 323 million rub Mistake was corrected approximately through
month.
