Netherlands became the first country, accepting a claim of former managers “Yukosa”. At the end of April the appeal court of Amsterdam decreeed to exact with “Rosnefti” 13 milliard of roubles in behalf on the Luxemburg company Yukos Capital. However in one and a half months, passing after acceptance of this decision, there were not even hints on the willingness of the Russian oil business concern to pay on accounts, writes "Deutsche Welle".menedzhery daughters "Yukosa" filed action as early as 2006. They required debt retirement
on a loan which Yukos Capital gave out at one time "Yuganskneftegazu". As "Rosneft’" got in 2004 complete control above "Yuganskneftegazom", a debt to pay relies to the new proprietor. The proper decision was accepted by international commercial
arbitration court at the Commercial and industrial chamber of Russia. However much guidance of goskorporacii contested this verdict, and the Russian courts, including the Higher arbitration court, acceded to that the debt of bankrupt can be not paid.Meantime complication of dispute, as explained
one of by the attorney of Mikhail Khodorkovskogo Vadim Klyuvgant, consists in that on territory of Netherlands results of bankruptcy "Yukosa" not acknowledged, and the Dutch court it "explained sufficiently clear"."Accordingly "YUKOS" acknowledged as
organization, and his rights and interests are subject to defence", – Klyuvgant said. the ordinary dispute of managing subjects grew into political business, and Russia, as declared Deutsche Welle independent political scientist Dmitry Oreshkin, can lose in this conflict more than
company "Rosneft’". "A debt in a count makes a 300 million euro, and it for a large oil corporation not new what money. So above all things it is possible to talk not about economic losses, but about a serious blow to prestige of Russia", – Oreshkin talks.
A choice is such: either to pay on a lawsuit or go away from European space, that is related to the yet greater losses for reputation. According to a political scientist, that, who undertook this process, it was necessary to foresee such the turn of events.Leader of Institute of problems of globalization
Mikhail Delyagin agrees with a colleague: "If the Russian state encourages tyranny, lawlessness and violence, thus politically explained, t
costs also can appear enough serious, as "Rosneft’" it goskompaniya, very meaningful for the Russian economy on the whole.Exactly because a company is state, will pay on accounts not only "Rosneft’", but also the Russian citizens,
an expert considers. Dmitry Oreshkin marks in same queue, that "Rosneft’" instinctively associate with the state, but only in those cases, when it is advantageous: "In Russia matter of course, when quotients arrived, and costs are state".analitik by an investment
companies "Veles-kapital" Dmitry Lityagin supposes that in this situation actions can it was be put a directly to the Russian state, and it "more grounded variant". Lityagin considers that the prolonged silence after the decision of Amsterdam
ships are dangerously for Russia, because legal grounds appear for the arrest of foreign property of goskompanii.Lawyers underline that the decision of international commercial arbitration court is subject to execution in more than 140 stranakh-uchastnicakh by New York
conventions about confession and coersion to execute of foreign arbitral awards. Among these states – The USA, Great Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia. Knowing about a presence there assets "Rosnefti", Yukos Capital can appeal to state
court of the proper country with a requirement to carry out the decision of international arbitration court.
